Smooth and bulky tissue

ABSTRACT

The present disclosure provides high bulk tissue products, as well as an apparatus and methods for manufacturing the same. The tissue products provided herein not only have high bulk, but they also have improved surface smoothness, particularly compared to tissue products of similar basis weights.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a divisional application and claims priorityto U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/438,415, filed on Apr. 24, 2015,which is a national-phase entry, under 35 U.S.C. § 371, of PCT PatentApplication No. PCT/US13/72231, filed on Nov. 27, 2013, which claimsbenefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/731,651, filed on Nov.30, 2012, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND

For rolled tissue products, such as bathroom tissue and paper towels,consumers generally prefer firm rolls having a large diameter. A firmroll conveys superior product quality and a large diameter conveyssufficient material to provide value for the consumer. From thestandpoint of the tissue manufacturer, however, providing a firm rollhaving a large diameter is a challenge. In order to provide a largediameter roll, while maintaining an acceptable cost of manufacture, thetissue manufacturer must produce a finished tissue roll having higherroll bulk. One means of increasing roll bulk is to wind the tissue rollloosely. Loosely wound rolls however, have low firmness and are easilydeformed, which makes them unappealing to consumers. As such, there is aneed for tissue rolls having high bulk as well as good firmness.

Furthermore, it is desirable to provide a rolled tissue product having ahigh-basis-weight tissue sheet that is also soft. To provide a tissueproduct that is perceived as being soft, the tissue manufacturer isfaced with a myriad of choices, including altering the surfacetopography of the tissue product so that its user perceives it as beingsmooth.

Although it is desirable to provide a sheet having high-basis-weight,bulk, good roll firmness, and a smooth surface, improvement of one ofthese properties typically comes at the expense of another. For example,as the basis weight of the tissue sheets is increased, achieving highroll bulk becomes more challenging, particularly when manufacturinguncreped through-air dried webs since much of the bulk of the tissuestructure is achieved by molding of the embryonic tissue web into thepaper-making fabric and this bulk is decreased by increasing the basisweight of the sheet. Hence the tissue manufacturer must strive toeconomically produce a tissue roll that meets these often-contradictoryparameters of large diameter, good firmness, high quality sheets andacceptable cost.

SUMMARY

It has now been surprisingly discovered that forming a textured tissueproduct using a through-air drying fabric having a three dimensionaldesign element results in a tissue product having high surfacesmoothness, low stiffness and improved bulk. Accordingly, in one aspectthe present disclosure provides a single-ply tissue web having a basisweight greater than about 35 grams per square meter (gsm), a StiffnessIndex from about 4 to about 8 and a geometric mean tensile (GMT) fromabout 700 to about 1200 g/3″.

In another aspect the present disclosure provides a multi-ply tissue webhaving a basis weight greater than about 40 gsm, a Stiffness Index fromabout 4 to about 8 and a GMT from about 700 to about 1200 g/3″.

In other aspects the present disclosure provides single and multi-plytissue webs spirally wound into tissue rolls, the tissue webs having abasis weight greater than about 35 gsm, a Stiffness Index less thanabout 8 and a GMT from about 700 to about 1200 g/3″, the rolls having aroll bulk from about 14 to about 18 cc/g and a Roll Firmness from about8 to about 10 mm.

In still other aspects the present disclosure provides a rolled tissueproduct comprising a spirally wound tissue web having a sheet bulkgreater than about 15 cc/g, the rolled tissue product having a RollStructure greater than about 1.0, such as from about 1.0 to about 2.0and in certain preferred embodiments from about 1.2 to about 1.8.

In other aspects the present disclosure provides a single-ply tissue webhaving a sheet bulk greater than about 15 cc/g and a Surface SmoothnessS90 value less than about 105 μm.

In yet other aspects the present disclosure provides a multi-ply tissueweb having a caliper greater than about 600 μm and a Surface SmoothnessS90 value less than about 95 μm.

In other aspects the disclosure provides a rolled tissue productcomprising a multi-ply tissue web spirally wound into a roll, the tissueweb having a sheet bulk greater than about 15 cc/g, Surface SmoothnessSa value less than about 95 μm and a Surface Smoothness Sq value lessthan about 30 μm.

In still other aspects the present disclosure provides a tissue webhaving a basis weight greater than about 38 gsm, a sheet bulk greaterthan about 15 cc/g and a Surface Smoothness S90 value less than about105 μm.

In other aspects the present disclosure provides a tissue web having abasis weight greater than about 38 gsm, a sheet bulk greater than about15 cc/g, a Surface Smoothness Sa value less than about 25 μm, a SurfaceSmoothness Sq value less than about 40 μm and a Surface Smoothness S90value less than about 105 μm.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a view of a fabric useful in the manufacture of tissue websaccording to one embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 2 is top perspective view of a fabric useful in the manufacture oftissue webs according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 3 is a cross section view of a fabric useful in the manufacture oftissue webs according to one embodiment of the present disclosure takenthrough line 3-3 of FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 illustrates a continuous fabric useful in the manufacture oftissue webs according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 5 is a graph comparing sheet bulk (x-axis) and Stiffness Index(y-axis) for inventive and prior art tissue products;

FIG. 6 is a graph comparing sheet bulk (x-axis) and Surface SmoothnessS90 (y-axis) for inventive and prior art tissue products;

FIG. 7 is a graph comparing caliper (x-axis) and Stiffness Index(y-axis) for inventive and prior art tissue products;

FIG. 8 is a graph comparing caliper (x-axis) and Surface Smoothness S90(y-axis) for inventive and prior art tissue products;

FIGS. 9A and 9B are a side-by-side comparison of tissue web crosssections prepared using two different through-air drying fabrics aT-1205-2 fabric (9A) and the fabric illustrated in FIG. 10 (9B); and

FIG. 10 is a photograph of a through-air drying fabric useful in formingtissue products according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.

DEFINITIONS

As used herein, the term “tissue product” refers to products made fromtissue webs and includes, bath tissues, facial tissues, paper towels,industrial wipers, foodservice wipers, napkins, medical pads, and othersimilar products. Tissue products may comprise one, two, three or moreplies.

As used herein, the terms “tissue web” and “tissue sheet” refer to afibrous sheet material suitable for forming a tissue product.

As used herein, the term “geometric mean tensile” (GMT) refers to thesquare root of the product of the machine direction tensile and thecross-machine direction tensile of the web, which are determined asdescribed in the Test Method section.

As used herein, the term “caliper” is the representative thickness of asingle sheet (caliper of tissue products comprising two or more plies isthe thickness of a single sheet of tissue product comprising all plies)measured in accordance with TAPPI test method T402 using an EMVECO 200-AMicrogage automated micrometer (EMVECO, Inc., Newberg, Oreg.). Themicrometer has an anvil diameter of 2.22 inches (56.4 mm) and an anvilpressure of 132 grams per square inch (per 6.45 square centimeters) (2.0kPa).

As used herein, the term “basis weight” generally refers to the bone dryweight per unit area of a tissue and is generally expressed as grams persquare meter (gsm). Basis weight is measured using TAPPI test methodT-220.

As used herein, the term “sheet bulk” refers to the quotient of thecaliper (μm) divided by the bone dry basis weight (gsm). The resultingsheet bulk is expressed in cubic centimeters per gram (cc/g).

As used herein, the term “roll bulk” refers to the volume of paperdivided by its mass on the wound roll. Roll bulk is calculated bymultiplying pi (3.142) by the quantity obtained by calculating thedifference of the roll diameter squared (cm²) and the outer corediameter squared (cm²) divided by 4, divided by the quantity sheetlength (cm) multiplied by the sheet count multiplied by the bone drybasis weight of the sheet (gsm).

As used herein, the term “slope” refers to slope of the line resultingfrom plotting tensile versus stretch and is an output of the MTSTestWorks™ in the course of determining the tensile strength asdescribed in the Test Methods section herein. Slope is reported in theunits of grams (g) per unit of sample width (inches) and is measured asthe gradient of the least-squares line fitted to the load-correctedstrain points falling between a specimen-generated force of 70 to 157grams (0.687 to 1.540 N) divided by the specimen width. Slopes aregenerally reported herein as having units of grams per 3 inch samplewidth or g/3″.

As used herein, the term “geometric mean slope” (GM Slope) generallyrefers to the square root of the product of machine direction slope andcross-machine direction slope.

As used herein, the term “stretch” generally refers to the ratio of theslack-corrected elongation of a specimen at the point it generates itspeak load divided by the slack-corrected gauge length in any givenorientation. Stretch is an output of the MTS TestWorks™ in the course ofdetermining the tensile strength as described in the Test Methodssection herein. Stretch is reported as a percentage and may be reportedfor machine direction stretch (MDS), cross-machine direction stretch(CDS) or as geometric mean stretch (GMS), which is the square root ofthe product of machine direction stretch and cross-machine directionstretch.

As used herein, the term “Roll Firmness,” generally refers to theability of a rolled tissue product to withstand deflection whenimpacted, which is determined as described in the Test Methods section.

As used herein, the term “Roll Structure” generally refers to theoverall appearance and quality of a rolled tissue product and is theproduct of Roll Bulk (expressed in cc/g) and caliper (express in cm)divided by Firmness (expressed in cm). Roll Structure is generallyreferred to herein without reference to units.

As used herein, the term “Stiffness Index” refers to the quotient of thegeometric mean slope (having units of g/3″) divided by the geometricmean tensile strength (having units of g/3″).

As used herein, the term “Surface Smoothness” refers to the filteredsurface image topography measured as described in the Test Methodsection. Surface Smoothness is expressed as three different values—Sa,Sq and S90—and may have units of millimeters (mm) or microns (μm).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Bulk is an important property for the absorption capacity and hand-feelof tissue webs and products. Increasing the bulk of tissue webs andproducts, however, often comes at the expense of other properties suchas surface smoothness. Traditionally the tissue maker has needed toresort to high topography papermaking fabrics to achieve high bulk.While increasing the caliper of the tissue web at a given basis weight,and therefore the sheet bulk, the use of high topography fabrics oftenimpart the web with a three dimensional surface that is not particularlysmooth.

The present inventors have now surprisingly discovered that certainpapermaking fabrics and in particular through-air drying fabrics havingpatterns topically disposed thereon may be used to produce tissue websand products that are both smooth and have high bulk. Accordingly, incertain embodiments the present disclosure provides a tissue web havinga sheet bulk greater than about 12 cubic centimeters per gram (cc/g),such as from about 12 to about 20 cc/g, and a Surface Smoothness S90value less than about 105 μm. In other embodiments the disclosureprovides rolled tissue products formed by spirally winding tissue webswhere the rolled tissue products have improved roll bulk, such asgreater than about 14 cc/g, and improved Roll Firmness, such as fromabout 8 to about 10 mm.

In accordance with certain embodiments, high bulk tissue webs aremanufactured using an endless papermaking belt, such as a through-airdrying (TAD) fabric, having a three dimensional pattern disposedthereon. Preferably the three dimensional pattern is disposed on the webcontacting surface for cooperating with, and structuring of, the wetfibrous web during manufacturing. In a particularly preferred embodimentthe web-contacting three-dimensional structure comprises a plurality ofelevations distributed across the web-contacting surface of the belt andtogether constituting from about 15 to about 35 percent, in aparticularly preferred embodiment from about 18 to about 30 percent, andin a particularly preferred embodiment about 20 to about 25 percent ofthe web-contacting surface.

In addition to elevations, the web-contacting surface preferablycomprises a plurality of continuous landing areas between theelevations. The landing areas are bounded by the elevations andcoextensive with the top surface plane of the belt.

Each elevation has a first dimension in a first direction (x) in theplane of the top surface area, a second dimension in a second direction(y) in the plane of the top surface area, the first and seconddirections (x, y) being at right angles to each other, a mean height (h)and an area (a) as measured in the plane of the top surface area, thesedimensions being defined when the belt is in an uncompressed state.

One belt for manufacturing a high bulk tissue according to the presentdisclosure is illustrated in FIG. 1, in one embodiment the endless belt10 has two principal elements: a carrier structure 30 and threedimensional design elements 40 (also referred to herein as“elevations”). The carrier structure 30 has two opposed surfaces—atissue contacting surface 50 and a machine contacting surface. Generallythe design elements 40 are disposed on the tissue contacting surface 50.When the belt 10 comprises a through-air drying fabric the tissuecontacting surface 50 supports the embryonic tissue web, while theopposite surface, the machine contacting surface, contacts thethroughdryer.

The carrier structure 30 has two principle dimensions—a machinedirection (“MD”), which is the direction within the plane of the belt 10parallel to the principal direction of travel of the tissue web duringmanufacture and a cross-machine direction (“CD”), which is generallyorthogonal to the machine direction.

The carrier structure is preferably a woven fabric, and in aparticularly preferred embodiment a substantially planar woven fabricsuch as a multi-layered plain-woven fabric 30 having base warp yarns 32interwoven with shute yarns 34 in a 1×1 plain weave pattern. Anexemplary multi-layered fabric is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,141,595,the contents of which are incorporated herein in a manner consistentwith the present disclosure. In the fabric 30, the plain-weaveload-bearing layer is constructed so that the highest points of both theload-bearing shutes 34 and the load-bearing warps 32 are coplanar andcoincident with the plane 70.

As illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3, the design elements 40 are joined tothe carrier structure 30 and extend outwardly from the paper contactingside 50 thereof in the Z-direction. Generally the design elements 40 aretopically applied to the carrier structure 30. Particularly suitablemethods of topical application are printing or extruding polymericmaterial onto the surface. Alternative methods include applying cast orcured films, weaving, embroidering or stitching polymeric fibers intothe surface to a design element. Particularly suitable polymericmaterials include materials that can be strongly adhered to carrierstructure and are resistant to thermal degradation at typical tissuemachine dryer operating conditions and are reasonably flexible, such assilicones, polyesters, polyurethanes, epoxies, polyphenylsulfides andpolyetherketones.

The design element 40 extends in the Z-direction (generally orthogonalboth the machine direction and cross-machine direction) above the plane70 of the carrier structure 30. The design elements 40 may have straightsidewalls or tapered sidewalls, and be made of any material suitable towithstand the temperatures, pressures, and deformations which occurduring the papermaking process. As illustrated in FIG. 3, the designelements 40 are similarly sized and have generally straight, parallelsidewalls 42, providing the elements 40 with a width (w), and a height(h). For the embodiments described herein, the design elements 40preferably have a height between 0.6 and 3.0 mm, preferably between 0.7and 1.4 mm, and in a particularly preferred embodiment between 0.8 and1.0 mm. The height (h) is generally measured as the distance between theplane of the carrier structure and the top plane of the elevations.

In addition to having a height (h), the elevations 40 have a width (w).The width is measured generally normal to the principal dimension of theelevation 40 within the plane of the belt 10 at a given location. Wherethe element 40 has a generally square or rectangular cross section, thewidth (w) is generally measured as the distance between the two planarsidewalls 42, 44 that form the element 40. In those cases where theelement does not have planar sidewalls, the width is measured at thepoint where the element 40 contacts the carrier 30.

Generally, for the embodiments described herein, the design elements 40have a width from about 0.6 to 3.1 mm, in a particularly preferredembodiment from about 0.7 to about 1.5 mm, and still more preferablyfrom about 0.8 to about 1.1 mm.

In a particularly preferred embodiment the design elements 40 preferablyhave planar sidewalls 42, 44 such that the cross section of the designelement has an overall square or rectangular shape. However, it is to beunderstood that the design element may have other cross sectionalshapes, such as triangular, convex or concave, which may also be usefulin producing high bulk tissue products according to the presentdisclosure. Accordingly, in a particularly preferred embodiment thedesign elements 40 preferably have planar sidewalls 42, 44 and a squarecross section where the width (w) and height (h) are equal and vary fromabout 0.6 to about 3.0 mm, in a particularly preferred embodiment fromabout 0.7 to about 1.4 mm and still more preferably from about 0.8 toabout 1.0 mm.

With further reference to FIG. 2, a preferred embodiment illustratingthe spacing and arrangement of elevations 40 is illustrated. Generally,none of the elevations 40 intersect one another and preferably arearranged parallel to one another. As such, in the illustratedembodiment, the adjacent sidewalls of individual design elements areequally spaced apart from one another.

For the embodiments described herein, the center-to-center spacing ofdesign elements (also referred to herein as pitch or simply as p) isfrom about 1.7 to about 20 mm apart, such as from about 2.0 to about 10mm apart, and in a particularly preferred embodiment from about 3.8 toabout 4.4 mm apart, in a direction generally orthogonal to suchsurfaces. This spacing will result in a tissue web which generatesmaximum caliper when made of conventional cellulosic fibers. Further,this arrangement provides a tissue web having three dimensional surfacetopography, yet relatively uniform density.

As further illustrated in FIG. 2, the design elements 40 may occur aswave-like patterns that are arranged in-phase with one another such thatp is approximately constant. In other embodiments design elements mayform a wave pattern where adjacent design elements are offset from oneanother. Regardless of the particular design element pattern, or whetheradjacent patterns are in or out of phase with one another, the designelements are separated from one another by some minimal distance.Preferably the distance between design elements 40 is greater than 0.7mm and in a particularly preferred embodiment greater than about 1.0 mmand still more preferably greater than about 2.0 mm such as from about2.0 to about 6.0 mm and still more preferably from about 3.0 to about4.5 mm.

Where the design elements 40 are wave-like, such as those illustrated inFIG. 1, the design elements have an amplitude (A) and a wavelength (L).The amplitude may range from about 2.0 to about 200 mm, in aparticularly preferred embodiment from about 10 to about 40 mm and stillmore preferably from about 18 to about 22 mm. Similarly, the wavelengthmay range from about 20 to about 500 mm, in a particularly preferredembodiment from about 50 to about 200 mm and still more preferably fromabout 80 to about 120 mm.

Preferably a plurality of design elements are disposed on the carrierstructure and extend substantially throughout one dimension thereof, andeach element in the plurality is spaced apart from adjacent elements. Inthis manner the elements may span the entire cross-machine direction ofthe belt and may endlessly encircle the belt in the machine direction.For example, as illustrated in FIG. 4, the elements 40 are orientedsubstantially parallel to the machine direction of the belt 10.

The polymeric material, or other material used to form the designelements 40, may be applied and joined to the carrier structure in anysuitable manner. One manner of attachment and joining the design elementonto the carrier structure is described in U.S. application Ser. No.10/535,537, the contents of which are incorporated herein by referencein a manner consistent with the present disclosure. Thus, in aparticularly preferred embodiment, the design element is formed byextruding or printing a polymeric material onto the carrier structure.In other embodiments the design element may be produced, at least insome regions, by extruding two or more polymeric materials. Suitablepolymer materials include silicones, polyesters, polyurethanes, epoxies,polyphenylsulfides and polyetherketones.

In addition to the design elements 40 the belt 10 further compriseslanding areas 60, which are bounded by the design elements 40. Thelanding areas 60 allow water to be removed from the web by theapplication of differential fluid pressure, by evaporative mechanisms,or both when drying air passes through the web while on the belt 10 or avacuum is applied through the belt 10.

The arrangement of design elements 40 and landing areas 60 yield apapermaking fabric having a three dimensional surface topography, whichwhen used to form a tissue web, produces a web having relatively uniformdensity, yet three dimensional surface topography. The resulting webfurther has improved bulk, better softness, and improved surfacesmoothness compared to webs and products made according to the priorart. Similarly, rolled products prepared according to the presentdisclosure may have improved roll firmness and bulk, while stillmaintaining Surface Smoothness and strength properties.

For example, the present disclosure provides single-ply tissue productshaving improved caliper and bulk compared to commercially availablesingle-ply tissue products, while also having decreased stiffness. Theseimprovements translate into improved rolled products, as summarized inTable 1, below.

TABLE 1 Sheet GM GM Roll Roll Basis Wt. Caliper Bulk GMT Stretch SlopeStiffness Bulk Firmness Product (gsm) (μm) (cc/g) (g/3″) (%) (g/3″)Index (cc/g) (mm) Cottonelle Clean Care 41.1 498 12.1 861 11.9 7974 9.2610.9 7.8 Charmin Basic 29.9 348 11.6 913 12.5 8628 9.45 11 7.9 ScottExtra Soft 30.2 361 12.0 727 11.7 6998 9.63 9 3.9 Inventive Sample 41.6752 18.1 805 11.1 5988 7.4 15.4 9.3 Inventive Sample 41.0 752 18.3 97819.4 3826 3.91 15.3 9.2 Inventive Sample 43.9 782 17.8 927 12.1 58146.27 14.6 9.3

Accordingly, in certain embodiments, rolled tissue products may comprisea spirally wound single-ply or multi-ply (such as two, three or fourplies) tissue web having a basis weight greater than about 35 gsm, suchas from about 35 to about 60 gsm and in a particularly preferredembodiment from about 38 to about 50 gsm.

Rolled tissue products comprising a spirally wound single-ply tissue webgenerally have a Roll Firmness less than about 10 mm, such as from about7 to about 10 mm and in a particularly preferred embodiment from about 8to about 9 mm. In one particular embodiment, for instance, thedisclosure provides a rolled tissue product comprising a spirally woundsingle-ply tissue web having a basis weight from about 35 to about 50gsm, wherein the roll has a Roll Firmness from about 8 to about 10 mm.Within the above-roll firmness ranges, rolls made according to thepresent disclosure do not appear to be overly soft and “mushy” as may beundesirable by some consumers during some applications.

In the past, at the above-roll firmness levels, spirally wound tissueproducts had a tendency to have low roll bulks and/or poor sheetsoftness properties. However, it has now been discovered that rolledtissue products having a firmness from about 7 to about 10 mm andcomprising single-ply webs having basis weights greater than about 35gsm can be produced such that the product has a roll bulk of greaterthan 10 cc/g, such as from about 10 to about 20 cc/g, and in aparticularly preferred embodiment from about 14 to about 18 cc/g, evenwhen spirally wound under tension. For instance, spirally wound productscomprising a single-ply web having a basis weight from about 35 to about50 gsm may have a roll bulk of greater than 12 cc/g while stillmaintaining a firmness of less than about 10 mm, such as from about 8 toabout 10 mm.

To produce rolled products having satisfactory roll bulk and firmness,the tissue web itself preferably has improved sheet bulk. For example,single-ply base sheets prepared as described herein may be converted torolled tissue product while still maintaining much of their sheet bulk,which is preferably greater than about 12 cc/g, such as from about 12 toabout 20 cc/g and in a particularly preferred embodiment from about 14to about 18 cc/g. In this manner base sheets may be subjected tocalendering or the like to soften the web while still maintaining asufficient amount of sheet bulk.

While having improved properties, the tissue webs prepared according tothe present disclosure continue to be strong enough to withstand use bya consumer. For example, tissue webs prepared according to the presentdisclosure may have a geometric mean tensile (GMT) greater than about700 g/3″, such as from about 800 to about 1500 g/3″, and in aparticularly preferred embodiment from about 900 to about 1200 g/3″.When the tissue webs of the present disclosure are converted into rolledtissue products, they maintain a significant amount of their tensilestrength, such that the decrease in geometric mean tensile duringconversion of the web to finished product is less than about 30 percentand in a particularly preferred embodiment less than about 25 percent,such as from about 10 to about 30 percent. As such the finished productspreferably have a geometric mean tensile strength of greater than 700g/3″, such as from about 800 to about 1200 g/3″, and in a particularlypreferred embodiment from about 900 to about 1100 g/3″.

In still other embodiments, the present disclosure provides tissue webshaving enhanced bulk, softness and durability. Improved durability, suchas increased machine and cross-machine direction stretch (MDS and CDS),and improved softness may be measured as a reduction in the slope of thetensile-strain curve or the Stiffness Index. For example, tissue websprepared as described herein generally have a geometric mean slope lessthan about 6,000 g/3″, such as from about 4,000 to about 6,000 g/3″, andin a particularly preferred embodiment from about 4,200 to about 5,000g/3″. Single-ply webs spirally wound into rolled products generally havea geometric mean slope less than about 10,000 g/3″, such as from about3,000 to about 9,000 g/3″ and in a particularly preferred embodimentfrom about 4,000 to about 8,000 g/3″. Two-ply webs spirally wound intorolled products generally have a geometric mean slope less than about9,000 g/3″, such as from about 4,000 to about 8,000 g/3″.

While the tissue webs of the present disclosure generally have lowergeometric mean slopes compared to webs of the prior art, the websmaintain a sufficient amount of tensile strength to remain useful to theconsumer. In this manner the disclosure provides base sheet and tissueproducts having a low Stiffness Index. For example, tissue webspreferably have a Stiffness Index less than about 8.0, such as fromabout 5.0 to about 7.0 and in a particularly preferred embodiment fromabout 4.0 to about 6.5. When converted into rolled products the tissueweb is often stiffened slightly. However, the amount of stiffnessintroduced to the inventive webs during conversion is minimal such thatsingle-ply tissue products have a Stiffness Index less than about 8.0,such as from about 4.0 to about 7.0 and in a particularly preferredembodiment from about 5.0 to about 6.5. In a particularly preferredembodiment the present disclosure provides a single-ply tissue webhaving a bone dry basis weight greater than about 35 gsm, a StiffnessIndex from about 4 to about 8 and a GMT from about 700 to about 1000g/3″.

Similarly, tissue webs that are converted to finished product, forexample by calendering or the like, generally have decreased machine andcross-direction stretch (MDS and CDS respectively) relative to the basesheet. However, the reduction in CDS and MDS is relatively minimal forproducts prepared according to the present disclosure. For example, incertain embodiments base sheets may have a geometric mean stretch (GMS)greater than about 12, such as from about 12 to about 30 and in aparticularly preferred embodiment from about 16 to about 25 percent. Thecorresponding finished single-ply product preferably has a GMS greaterthan about 10, such as from about 10 to about 20 and in a particularlypreferred embodiment from about 14 to about 18 percent.

As noted previously, webs prepared as described herein may be convertedinto either single or multi-ply rolled tissue products that haveimproved properties over the prior art. In one embodiment the presentdisclosure provides a rolled tissue product comprising a spirally woundtwo-ply tissue web, wherein the tissue web has a bone dry basis weightgreater than about 35 gsm, a sheet bulk greater than about 15 cc/g and aStiffness Index less than about 7. In a particularly preferredembodiment the rolled product has a roll bulk of greater than about 15cc/g and a Roll Firmness less than about 10 mm, such as from about 8 toabout 10 mm. For comparative purposes the improved properties ofmulti-ply tissue products are set forth in Table 2, below.

TABLE 2 Sheet GM GM Roll Roll Basis Wt. Caliper Bulk GMT Stretch SlopeStiffness Bulk Firmness Product (gsm) (μm) (cc/g) (g/3″) (%) (kg/3″)Index (cc/g) (mm) Cottonelle Ultra Comfort Care 42 597 14.2 916 13.16702 7.32 13.9 8.7 Charmin Ultra Soft 45.6 528 11.6 751 15.0 6609 8.8010.9 4.9 Quilted Northern Ultra Plush 55.4 546 9.86 730 13.5 6567 9.009.4 7.6 Great Value Ultra-Strong 35.4 475 13.4 1206 8.1 11447 9.49 13.69.4 Inventive Sample 42.1 704 16.7 922 11.9 6229 6.76 16.4 8.8

In addition to having improved bulk, stiffness, firmness and the like,tissue webs and products produced according to the methods set forthherein also have improved tactile properties such as improved SurfaceSmoothness. It is known in the art that the Pacinian system of receptorsin the human fingertip is most sensitive at a frequency of about 250 Hzwhere vibrations at, or near, 250 Hz are experienced as being rough.Thus, the perception of whether the surface of a tissue product is roughor smooth is dependent on the rate at which a user passes their fingerover the surface and the wavelength of any surface topography on thetissue. For example, if a user passes their fingers over the surface ofa tissue product at a rate of 4 cm/sec, a surface topography with awavelength of about 0.16 mm will be experienced as rough by the Paciniansystem.

Because of the relationship between surface topography and perceivedsmoothness or roughness, the relative feel of a tissue may be predictedbased upon its surface topography. Surface topography may be measuredusing profilometry, for example by the Smoothness Test Method set forthbelow. Profilometry is used to generate a digital image of the tissueproduct surface. The digital image is then filtered using a band passfilter with cut off spatial frequencies of 0.095 mm and 0.5 mm toemphasize spatial frequencies experienced as being most rough by thehuman fingertip. The filtered surface image is then analyzed to yieldSurface Smoothness values Sa, Sq and S90, where surfaces having lowervalues are generally perceived as being smoother.

Accordingly, in certain embodiments, tissue products of the currentdisclosure have improved smoothness, such as low Sa, Sq and/or S90values, while also having improved sheet caliper and bulk. For example,in one embodiment the disclosure provides a tissue product having aSurface Smoothness Sa value less than about 25 μm, an Sq value of lessthan about 35 μm, an S90 value less than about 105 μm and a sheet bulkof greater than 15 cc/g. In other embodiments the disclosure provides atissue product having a Surface Smoothness Sa value from about 15 toabout 25 μm. In other embodiment the disclosure provides a tissueproduct having a Surface Smoothness Sq value from about 25 to about 40μm. In still other embodiments the disclosure provides a tissue producthaving a Surface Smoothness S90 value from about 70 to about 120 μm. Acomparison of Surface Smoothness properties, as well as other productproperties, is set forth in the Table 3, below.

TABLE 3 Sheet Bulk Caliper Sa Sq S90 Product Plies (cc/g) (μm) (μm) (μm)(μm) Cottonelle Ultra 2 14.2 597 18.5 31.2 84.0 Comfort Care CharminUltra Soft 2 11.6 528 23.7 39.5 113 Quilted Northern 3 9.86 546 14.720.3 61.6 Ultra Plush Charmin Basic 1 11.6 348 17.0 27.4 78.7 CottonelleClean 1 12.1 498 16.0 23.6 71.3 Care Inventive Sample 1 17.8 782 21.133.7 95.1 Inventive Sample 2 16.7 922 19.5 30.7 90.8

In a particularly preferred embodiment the present disclosure provides amulti-ply tissue product having a caliper greater than about 600 μm,such as from about 600 μm to about 1000 μm and a Surface Smoothness S90value less than about 95 μm, such as from about 70 to about 95 μm. Instill other embodiments the present disclosure provides a single-plytissue product having a sheet bulk greater than about 15 cc/g, such asfrom about 15 to about 20 cc/g and a smooth surface, such that Sa isless than about 22 μm, Sq is less than about 35 μm and S90 is less thanabout 100 μm.

In other embodiments the disclosure provides a single-ply tissue producthaving a sheet bulk greater than about 15 cc/g, such as from about 15 toabout 20 cc/g, and a Surface Smoothness S90 value less than about 105μm, such as from about 70 to about 105 μm.

In addition to providing the foregoing benefits, it is also believedthat by forming a tissue web using a belt having a carrier structure anda suitably chosen design element that nesting may be reduced when thewebs are converted into rolled product forms. Reduced nesting in-turnimproves certain properties, such as bulk and firmness, of the rolledproduct. Typically, nesting arises as a result of using texturedthrough-air drying fabrics, which impart the tissue web with valleys andridges. While these ridges and valleys can provide many benefits to theresulting web, problems sometimes arise when the web is converted intofinal product forms. For example, when webs are converted to rolledproducts, the ridges and valleys of one winding are placed on top ofcorresponding ridges and valleys of the next winding, which causes theroll to become more tightly packed, thereby reducing roll bulk(increasing density) and making the winding of the product lessconsistent and controllable. Thus, in certain embodiments the presentdisclosure provides tissue products comprising a tissue web having athree dimensional design element, wherein the design elements reducenesting of the web when it is converted into a rolled product.

Rolls formed according to the present disclosure generally have higherroll bulk at a given roll firmness. Further, the rolls generally have asurprising degree of interlocking between successive wraps of thespirally wound web, improving roll structure at a given roll firmness,more specifically allowing less firm rolls to be made without slippagebetween wraps. For example, compared to tissue products produced using athrough-air drying fabric with an offset seam, rolled tissue products ofthe present disclosure have reduced nesting and improved roll structure.One measurement reduced nesting and improved roll structure, referred toherein as Roll Structure, is the product of Roll Bulk (expressed incc/g) and caliper (express in cm) divided by Firmness (expressed in cm).Generally rolled tissue products of the present invention have a RollStructure greater than about 1.0 and in a particularly preferredembodiment greater than about 1.25 and in a particularly preferredembodiment less than about 1.5, such as from about 1.0 to about 2.0 andin particularly preferred embodiments from about 1.2 to about 1.8. Acomparison of the Roll Structure of inventive samples and commerciallyavailable rolled products is provided in Table 4, below.

TABLE 4 Caliper Roll Bulk Firmness Roll Product Plies (cm) (cc/g) (cm)Structure Cottonelle Ultra 2 0.0597 13.9 0.87 0.95 Comfort Care CharminUltra Soft 2 0.0528 10.9 0.49 1.17 Quilted Northern 3 0.0546 9.4 0.760.68 Ultra Plush Cottonelle Clean 1 0.0498 10.9 0.78 0.70 Care CharminBasic 1 0.0348 11 0.79 0.48 Scott Extra Soft 1 0.0361 9 0.39 0.83Inventive 1 0.0752 15.4 0.64 1.81 Inventive 2 0.704 16.4 0.88 1.31

Webs useful in preparing spirally wound tissue products according to thepresent disclosure can vary depending upon the particular application.In general, the webs can be made from any suitable type of fiber. Forinstance, the base web can be made from pulp fibers, other naturalfibers, synthetic fibers, and the like. Suitable cellulosic fibers foruse in connection with this invention include secondary (recycled)papermaking fibers and virgin papermaking fibers in all proportions.Such fibers include, without limitation, hardwood and softwood fibers aswell as nonwoody fibers. Noncellulosic synthetic fibers can also beincluded as a portion of the furnish.

Tissue webs made in accordance with the present disclosure can be madewith a homogeneous fiber furnish or can be formed from a stratifiedfiber furnish producing layers within the single- or multi-ply product.Stratified base webs can be formed using equipment known in the art,such as a multi-layered headbox. Both strength and softness of the baseweb can be adjusted as desired through layered tissues, such as thoseproduced from stratified headboxes.

For instance, different fiber furnishes can be used in each layer inorder to create a layer with the desired characteristics. For example,layers containing softwood fibers have higher tensile strengths thanlayers containing hardwood fibers. Hardwood fibers, on the other hand,can increase the softness of the web. In one embodiment, the single-plybase web of the present disclosure includes a first outer layer and asecond outer layer containing primarily hardwood fibers. The hardwoodfibers can be mixed, if desired, with paper broke in an amount up toabout 10 percent by weight and/or softwood fibers in an amount up toabout 10 percent by weight. The base web further includes a middle layerpositioned in between the first outer layer and the second outer layer.The middle layer can contain primarily softwood fibers. If desired,other fibers, such as high-yield fibers or synthetic fibers may be mixedwith the softwood fibers in an amount up to about 10 percent by weight.

When constructing a web from a stratified fiber furnish, the relativeweight of each layer can vary depending upon the particular application.For example, in one embodiment, when constructing a web containing threelayers, each layer can be from about 15 to about 40 percent of the totalweight of the web, such as from about 25 to about 35 percent of theweight of the web.

Wet strength resins may be added to the furnish as desired to increasethe wet strength of the final product. Useful wet strength resinsinclude diethylenetriamine (DETA), triethylenetetrarnine (TETA),tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA), epichlorhydrin resin(s),polyamide-epichlorohydrin (RAE), or any combinations thereof, or anyresins to be considered in these families of resins. Particularlypreferred wet strength resins are polyamide-epichlorohydrin (PAE)resins. Commonly PAE resins are formed by first reacting a polyalkylenepolyamine and an aliphatic dicarboxylic acid or dicarboxylic acidderivative, A polyaminoamide made from diethylenetriamine and adipicacid or esters of dicarboxylic acid derivatives is most common. Theresulting polyaminoamide is then reacted with epichlorohydrin. UsefulRAE resins are sold under the trade name Kymene® (commercially availablefrom Ashland, inc., Covington, Ky.).

Similarly, dry strength resins can be added to the furnish as desired toincrease the dry strength of the final product. Such dry strength resinsinclude, but are not limited to carboxymethyl celluloses (CMC), any typeof starch, starch derivatives, gums, polyacrylamide resins, and othersas are well known. Commercial suppliers of such resins are the same asthose that supply the wet strength resins discussed above.

As described above, the tissue products of the present disclosure cangenerally be formed by any of a variety of papermaking processes knownin the art. Preferably the tissue web is formed by through-air dryingand can be either creped or uncreped. For example, a papermaking processof the present disclosure can utilize adhesive creping, wet creping,double creping, embossing, wet-pressing, air pressing, through-airdrying, creped through-air drying, uncreped through-air drying, as wellas other steps in forming the paper web. Some examples of suchtechniques are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,048,589, 5,399,412,5,129,988 and 5,494,554 all of which are incorporated herein in a mannerconsistent with the present disclosure. When forming multi-ply tissueproducts, the separate plies can be made from the same process or fromdifferent processes as desired.

Preferably the base web is formed by an uncreped through-air dryingprocess, such as the processes described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos.5,656,132 and 6,017,417, both of which are hereby incorporated byreference herein in a manner consistent with the present disclosure.

In one embodiment the web is formed using a twin wire former having apapermaking headbox that injects or deposits a furnish of an aqueoussuspension of papermaking fibers onto a plurality of forming fabrics,such as the outer forming fabric and the inner forming fabric, therebyforming a wet tissue web. The forming process of the present disclosuremay be any conventional forming process known in the papermakingindustry. Such formation processes include, but are not limited to,Fourdriniers, roof formers such as suction breast roll formers, and gapformers such as twin wire formers and crescent formers.

The wet tissue web forms on the inner forming fabric as the innerforming fabric revolves about a forming roll. The inner forming fabricserves to support and carry the newly-formed wet tissue web downstreamin the process as the wet tissue web is partially dewatered to aconsistency of about 10 percent based on the dry weight of the fibers.Additional dewatering of the wet tissue web may be carried out by knownpaper making techniques, such as vacuum suction boxes, while the innerforming fabric supports the wet tissue web. The wet tissue web may beadditionally dewatered to a consistency of greater than 20 percent, morespecifically between about 20 to about 40 percent, and more specificallyabout 20 to about 30 percent.

The forming fabric can generally be made from any suitable porousmaterial, such as metal wires or polymeric filaments. For instance, somesuitable fabrics can include, but are not limited to, Albany 84M and 94Mavailable from Albany International (Albany, N.Y.) Asten 856, 866, 867,892, 934, 939, 959, or 937; Asten Synweve Design 274, all of which areavailable from Asten Forming Fabrics, Inc. (Appleton, Wis.); and Voith2164 available from Voith Fabrics (Appleton, Wis.).

The wet web is then transferred from the forming fabric to a transferfabric while at a solids consistency of between about 10 to about 35percent, and particularly, between about 20 to about 30 percent. As usedherein, a “transfer fabric” is a fabric that is positioned between theforming section and the drying section of the web manufacturing process.

Transfer to the transfer fabric may be carried out with the assistanceof positive and/or negative pressure. For example, in one embodiment, avacuum shoe can apply negative pressure such that the forming fabric andthe transfer fabric simultaneously converge and diverge at the leadingedge of the vacuum slot. Typically, the vacuum shoe supplies pressure atlevels between about 10 to about 25 inches of mercury. As stated above,the vacuum transfer shoe (negative pressure) can be supplemented orreplaced by the use of positive pressure from the opposite side of theweb to blow the web onto the next fabric. In some embodiments, othervacuum shoes can also be used to assist in drawing the fibrous web ontothe surface of the transfer fabric.

Typically, the transfer fabric travels at a slower speed than theforming fabric to enhance the MD and CD stretch of the web, whichgenerally refers to the stretch of a web in its cross (CD) or machinedirection (MD) (expressed as percent elongation at sample failure). Forexample, the relative speed difference between the two fabrics can befrom about 1 to about 45 percent, in some embodiments from about 5 toabout 30 percent, and in some embodiments, from about 15 to about 28percent. This is commonly referred to as “rush transfer”. During “rushtransfer”, many of the bonds of the web are believed to be broken,thereby forcing the sheet to bend and fold into the depressions on thesurface of the transfer fabric. Such molding to the contours of thesurface of the transfer fabric may increase the MD and CD stretch of theweb. Rush transfer from one fabric to another can follow the principlestaught in any one of the following patents, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,667,636,5,830,321, 4,440,597, 4,551,199, 4,849,054, all of which are herebyincorporated by reference herein in a manner consistent with the presentdisclosure.

The wet tissue web is then transferred from the transfer fabric to athrough-air drying fabric. Typically, the transfer fabric travels atapproximately the same speed as the through-air drying fabric. However,a second rush transfer may be performed as the web is transferred fromthe transfer fabric to the through-air drying fabric. This rush transferis referred to as occurring at the second position and is achieved byoperating the through-air drying fabric at a slower speed than thetransfer fabric.

In addition to rush transferring the wet tissue web from the transferfabric to the through-air drying fabric, the wet tissue web may bemacroscopically rearranged to conform to the surface of the through-airdrying fabric with the aid of a vacuum transfer roll or a vacuumtransfer shoe. If desired, the through-air drying fabric can be run at aspeed slower than the speed of the transfer fabric to further enhance MDstretch of the resulting absorbent tissue product. The transfer may becarried out with vacuum assistance to ensure conformation of the wettissue web to the topography of the through-air drying fabric.

While supported by a through-air drying fabric, the wet tissue web isdried to a final consistency of about 94 percent or greater by athrough-air dryer. The web then passes through the winding nip betweenthe reel drum and the reel and is wound into a roll of tissue forsubsequent converting.

The following examples are intended to illustrate particular embodimentsof the present disclosure without limiting the scope of the appendedclaims.

Test Methods

Surface Smoothness

Surface Smoothness was measured by first generating a digital image ofthe fabric contacting surface of a sample using an FRT MicroSpy® Profileprofilometer (FRT of America, LLC, San Jose, Calif.) and then analyzingthe image using Nanovea® Ultra software version 6.2 (Nanovea Inc.,Irvine, Calif.). Samples (either base sheet or finished product) werecut into squares measuring 145×145 mm. The samples were then secured tothe x-y stage of the profilometer using tape, with the fabric contactingsurface of the sample facing upwards, being sure that the samples werelaid flat on the stage and not distorted within the profilometer fieldof view.

Once the sample was secured to the stage the profilometer was used togenerate a three dimension height map of the sample surface. A 1602×1602array of height values were obtained with a 30 μm spacing resulting in a48 mm MD×48 mm CD field of view having a vertical resolution 100 nm anda lateral resolution 6 μm. The resulting height map was exported to .sdf(surface data file) format.

Individual sample .sdf files were analyzed using Nanovea® Ultra version6.2 by performing the following functions:

-   -   (1) Using the “Thresholding” function of the Nanovea® Ultra        software the raw image (also referred to as the field) is        subjected to thresholding by setting the material ratio values        at 0.5 to 99.5 percent such that thresholding truncates the        measured heights to between the 0.5 percentile height and the        99.5 percentile height;    -   (2) Using the “Fill In Non-Measured Points” function of the        Nanovea® Ultra software the non-measured points are filled by a        smooth shape calculated from neighboring points;    -   (3) Using “Filtering>Wavyness+Roughness” function of the        Nanovea® Ultra software the field is spatially low pass filtered        (waviness) by applying a Robust Gaussian Filter with a cutoff        wavelength of 0.095 mm and selecting “manage end effects”;    -   (4) Using the “Filtering—Wavyness+Roughness” function of the        Nanovea® Ultra software the field is spatially high pass        filtered (roughness) using a Robust Gaussian Filter with a        cutoff wavelength of 0.5 mm and selecting “manage end effects”;    -   (5) Using the “Parameter Tables” study function of the Nanovea®        Ultra software ISO 25178 Values Sq (root mean square height,        expressed in units of mm) and Sa (arithmetic mean height,        expressed in units of mm) are calculated and reported;    -   (6) Using the “Abbott-Firestone Curve” study function of the        Nanovea® Ultra software an Abbott-Firestone Curve is generated        from which “interactive mode” is selected and a histogram of the        measured heights is generated, from the histogram an S90 value        (95 percentile height (c2) minus the 5 percentile height (c1),        expressed in units of mm) is calculated.        Based upon the foregoing, three values, indicative of surface        smoothness are reported—Sq, Sa and S90, which all have units        of mm. The units have been converted to microns for use herein.

Tensile

Samples for tensile strength testing are prepared by cutting a 3″ (76.2mm)×5″ (127 mm) long strip in either the machine direction (MD) orcross-machine direction (CD) orientation using a JDC Precision SampleCutter (Thwing-Albert Instrument Company, Philadelphia, Pa., Model No.JDC 3-10, Ser. No. 37333). The instrument used for measuring tensilestrengths is an MTS Systems Sintech 11S, Serial No. 6233. The dataacquisition software is MTS TestWorks™ for Windows Ver. 4 (MTS SystemsCorp., Research Triangle Park, N.C.). The load cell is selected fromeither a 50 or 100 Newton maximum, depending on the strength of thesample being tested, such that the majority of peak load values fallbetween 10 and 90 percent of the load cell's full scale value. The gaugelength between jaws is 2±0.04 inches (50.8±1 mm). The jaws are operatedusing pneumatic-action and are rubber coated. The minimum grip facewidth is 3″ (76.2 mm), and the approximate height of a jaw is 0.5 inches(12.7 mm). The crosshead speed is 10±0.4 inches/min (254±1 mm/min), andthe break sensitivity is set at 65 percent. The sample is placed in thejaws of the instrument, centered both vertically and horizontally. Thetest is then started and ends when the specimen breaks. The peak load isrecorded as either the “MD tensile strength” or the “CD tensilestrength” of the specimen depending on the sample being tested. At leastsix (6) representative specimens are tested for each product, taken “asis,” and the arithmetic average of all individual specimen tests iseither the MD or CD tensile strength for the product.

Roll Firmness

Roll Firmness was measured using the Kershaw Test as described in detailin U.S. Pat. No. 6,077,590, which is incorporated herein by reference ina manner consistent with the present disclosure. The apparatus isavailable from Kershaw Instrumentation, Inc. (Swedesboro, N.J.) and isknown as a Model RDT-2002 Roll Density Tester.

EXAMPLES Example 1

Base sheets were made using a through-air dried papermaking processcommonly referred to as “uncreped through-air dried” (“UCTAD”) andgenerally described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,607,551, the contents of whichare incorporated herein in a manner consistent with the presentdisclosure. Base sheets with a target bone dry basis weight of about 44grams per square meter (gsm) were produced. The base sheets were thenconverted and spirally wound into rolled tissue products.

In all cases the base sheets were produced from a furnish comprisingnorthern softwood kraft and eucalyptus kraft using a layered headbox fedby three stock chests such that the webs having three layers (two outerlayers and a middle layer) were formed. The two outer layers comprisedeucalyptus (each layer comprising 30 percent weight by total weight ofthe web) and the middle layer comprised softwood and eucalyptus. Theamount of softwood and eucalyptus kraft in the middle layer wasmaintained for all inventive samples—the middle layered comprised 29percent (by total weight of the web) softwood and 11 percent (by totalweight of the web) eucalyptus. Strength was controlled via the additionof starch and/or by refining the furnish as set forth in Table 6, below.

The tissue web was formed on a Voith Fabrics TissueForm V formingfabric, vacuum dewatered to approximately 25 percent consistency andthen subjected to rush transfer when transferred to the transfer fabric.The transfer fabric was the fabric described as “Fred” in U.S. Pat. No.7,611,607 (commercially available from Voith Fabrics, Appleton, Wis.).

The web was then transferred to a through-air drying fabric comprising aprinted silicone pattern disposed on the sheet contacting side(hereinafter referred to as “Fozzie”). The silicone formed a wave-likepattern on the sheet contacting side of the fabric. The silicone patternis illustrated in FIG. 8. The pattern properties are summarized in Table5, below.

TABLE 5 Pattern Height Pattern Pitch Pattern Wavelength PatternAmplitude (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) 0.9 4.1 100 20Transfer to the through-drying fabric was done using vacuum levels ofgreater than 10 inches of mercury at the transfer. The web was thendried to approximately 98 percent solids before winding.

Table 6 shows the process conditions for each of the samples prepared inaccordance with the present example. Table 7 summarizes the physicalproperties of the base sheet webs.

TABLE 6 Base Sheet Base Rush Basis Sheet Refining Starch TAD TransferWeight GMT Sample (hpt/day) (lbs/MT) Fabric (%) (gsm) (g/3″) 1 0 0FOZZIE 28 44.7 1041 2 3.4 0 FOZZIE 28 44.9 1374 3 5.5 0 FOZZIE 45 45.31032 4 2.4 0 FOZZIE 45 44.3 1296

TABLE 7 Base Sheet Base Sheet Base Sheet Base Sheet Base Sheet CaliperBulk MD Stretch CD Stretch GM Slope Base Sheet Sample (μm) (cc/g) (%)(%) (g/3″) Stiffness Index 1 1163 26.0 19.5 10.8 5940 5.70 2 1138 25.420.5 12.1 7168 5.22 3 1156 25.5 36.2 14.9 4376 4.24 4 1186 26.8 40.216.3 5734 4.42

The base sheet webs were converted into various bath tissue rolls.Specifically, base sheet was calendered using one or two conventionalpolyurethane/steel calenders comprising either a 4 or a 40 P&Jpolyurethane roll on the air side of the sheet and a standard steel rollon the fabric side. Process conditions for each sample are provided inTable 8, below. All rolled products comprised a single-ply of basesheet, such that rolled product sample Roll 1 comprised a single-ply ofbase sheet sample 1, Roll 2 comprised a single-ply of base sheet sample2, and so forth.

TABLE 8 4 P&J 40 P&J Product Product Calender Calender Product SheetSheet Roll Roll Roll Load Load Basis Wt. Caliper Bulk Diameter BulkFirmness Sample (pli) (pli) (gsm) (μm) (cc/g) (mm) (cc/g) (mm) Roll 1 0100 41.6 752 18.1 127.8 15.4 9.3 Roll 2 0 120 42.0 742 17.7 127.4 15.18.8 Roll 3 0 120 41.5 745 18.0 126.4 15.0 9.6 Roll 4 0 120 41.0 752 18.3126.6 15.3 9.2

TABLE 9 Product Product Product Product Product GMT MD Stretch CDStretch GM Slope Stiffness Sample (g/3″) (%) (%) (g/3″) Index Roll 1 80516.2 8.6 5988 7.4 Roll 2 996 17.4 9.5 6385 6.41 Roll 3 793 30.3 11.43391 4.28 Roll 4 978 31.0 12.2 3826 3.91

The finished products were subjected to Surface Smoothness analysis, asdescribed in the Test Method section above. The results of the SurfaceSmoothness analysis are summarized in Table 10, below.

TABLE 10 Sheet Bulk GMT Sa Sq S90 Sample (cc/g) (g/3″) (μm) (μm) (μm) 217.7 996 18.5 29.2  83.4 3 18.0 793 21.7 35.0 100.0

Example 2

Additional inventive tissue base sheet was prepared substantially asdescribed in Example 1 with the objective of increasing the basis weightof the single-ply tissue product and also producing a two-ply tissueproduct. Specifically, base sheet was prepared as described above usingthe process conditions set forth in Table 10, below. Base sheet wasconverted to one or two-ply rolled products by calendering using one ortwo conventional polyurethane/steel calenders comprising either a 4 or a40 P&J polyurethane roll on the air side of the sheet and a standardsteel roll on the fabric side. Process conditions for each sample areprovided in Table 11, below. The calendered base sheet was convertedinto either one- or two-ply rolled tissue products. Two-ply rolledtissue products were formed by bringing two tissue webs into facingarrangement with one another and spray laminating to join the webs. Thewebs were not embossed or subject to other treatments. The rolledproducts were formed such that Roll 5 comprised two plies of Sample web5, and so on.

Table 11 shows the process conditions for each of the samples preparedin accordance with the present example. Table 12 summarizes the physicalproperties of the resulting tissue product.

TABLE 11 4 P&J 40 P&J Rush Calender Calender Refining Starch TADTransfer Load Load Sample (hpt/day) (lbs/MT) Fabric (%) (pli) (pli)Plies 5 0 4 FOZZIE 28 0 0 1 6 0 4 FOZZIE 28 0 10 1 7 0 4 FOZZIE 28 0 201 8 0 8 FOZZIE 28 30 90 2 9 0 8 FOZZIE 28 0 50 2 10 0 7 FOZZIE 28 30 902

TABLE 12 Product Product Product Product Product Sheet Sheet Product GMGM Product Roll Roll Basis Wt. Caliper Bulk GMT Stretch Slope StiffnessBulk Firmness Sample (gsm) (μm) (cc/g) (g/3″) (%) (g/3″) Index (cc/g)(mm) Roll 5 43.9 782 17.8 927 12.1 5814 6.3 14.6 9.3 Roll 6 45.3 94620.9 934 13.4 6063 6.5 16.4 5.1 Roll 7 44.1 841 19.1 913 12.5 5923 6.515.3 7.6 Roll 8 41.5 583 14.1 850 11.1 6429 7.6 14.5 9.7 Roll 9 42.1 70316.7 922 12.0 6229 6.8 16.4 8.8  Roll 10 42.0 841 20.0 976 9.9 8973 9.214.0 9.1

The finished products were subjected to Surface Smoothness analysis, asdescribed in the Test Method section above. The results of the SurfaceSmoothness analysis are summarized in Table 13, below.

TABLE 13 Sheet Bulk GMT Sa Sq S90 Sample (cc/g) (g/3″) (μm) (μm) (μm) 517.8 927 20.7 33.6 94.8 6 20.9 934 23.0 37.9 105.0 7 19.1 913 21.9 34.9100.0 8 14.1 850 16.7 25.8 76.0 9 16.7 922 19.5 30.7 90.8 10 20.0 97617.8 28.1 83.2

Example 3

Additional inventive tissue base sheet was prepared substantially asdescribed in Example 1 with the objective of increasing the basis weightof the single-ply tissue product. Specifically, base sheet was preparedas described above using the process conditions set forth in Table 14,below. Base sheet was converted to one-ply rolled products bycalendering using one or two conventional polyurethane/steel calenderscomprising either a 4 or a 40 P&J polyurethane roll on the air side ofthe sheet and a standard steel roll on the fabric side as indicated inthe table below and converted into single-ply rolled tissue products.

TABLE 14 4 P&J 40 P&J Rush Calender Calender Refining Starch TADTransfer Load Load Sample (hpt/day) (lbs/MT) Fabric (%) (pli) (pli)Plies 11 2.25 1.06 FOZZIE 28 0 75 1

TABLE 15 Base- Base- Base- Base- sheet Base- Base- sheet sheet sheetBasis sheet sheet MD CD GM Weight GMT Caliper Stretch Stretch SlopeSample (gsm) (g/3″) (μm) (%) (%) (gf) 11 52.33 1108 1161 23.07 13.2 7387

TABLE 16 Product Product Product Product Product Sheet Sheet Product GMGM Product Roll Roll Basis Wt. Caliper Bulk GMT Stretch Slope StiffnessBulk Firmness Sample (gsm) (μm) (cc/g) (g/3″) (%) (g/3″) Index (cc/g)(mm) Roll 11 49.2 700 14.2 857 11.4 6631 7.7 12.96 8.4

The finished products were subjected to Surface Smoothness analysis, asdescribed in the Test Method section above. The results of the SurfaceSmoothness analysis are summarized in Table 17, below.

TABLE 17 Sheet Bulk GMT Sa Sq S90 Sample (cc/g) (g/3″) (μm) (μm) (μm) 1114.2 857 19.4 30.6 85.7

While the invention has been described in detail with respect to thespecific embodiments thereof, it will be appreciated that those skilledin the art, upon attaining an understanding of the foregoing, mayreadily conceive of alterations to, variations of, and equivalents tothese embodiments. Accordingly, the scope of the present disclosureshould be assessed as that of the appended claims and any equivalentsthereto.

1. A single-ply tissue web having a sheet bulk greater than about 15cc/g and a Surface Smoothness S90 value less than about 105 μm.
 2. Thesingle-ply tissue web of claim 1 having a Stiffness Index from about 4to about
 8. 3. The single-ply tissue web of claim 1 having a geometricmean slope less than about 10,000 grams per 76.2 mm sample width.
 4. Thesingle-ply tissue web of claim 1 having a geometric mean stretch greaterthan about 10 percent.
 5. The single-ply tissue web of claim 1 having abasis weight from about 35 to about 50 gsm and a GMT from about 700 toabout 1400 grams per 76.2 mm sample width.
 6. The single-ply tissue webof claim 1 having a Surface Smoothness Sa value less than about 25 μmand a Surface Smoothness Sq value less than about 40 μm.
 7. Thesingle-ply tissue web of claim 1 wherein the single-ply tissue webcomprises a through-air dried web.
 8. The single-ply tissue web of claim1 wherein the single-ply tissue web comprises an uncreped through-airdried web.
 9. A single ply tissue having a sheet bulk greater than about15 cc/g, a geometric mean stretch from about 14 to about 18 percent, ageometric mean slope from about 4,000 to about 8,000 grams per 76.2 mmsample width and geometric mean tensile from about 800 to about 1,200grams per 76.2 mm sample width.
 10. The single ply tissue product ofclaim 9 having a CD Stretch greater than about 10 percent.
 11. Thesingle ply tissue product of claim 9 having a basis weight from about 35to about 45 grams per square meter.
 12. The single ply tissue product ofclaim 9 having a Surface Smoothness S90 value from about 70 to about 95μm.